In vitro Effect of Occlusal Loading on Cervical Wall Lesion Development in a Class II Composite Restoration.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of simulated occlusal loading on wall lesion development in cervical gaps of class II composite restorations in vitro. Sixty-four extracted human molars received standardized (4.0 × 4.2 × 3.0 mm) box preparations. The teeth were randomly assigned to one of two restoration groups: restoration with a normal or a low E-modulus composite material (CLEARFIL AP-X: E-modulus 16.8 GPa or CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow: E-modulus 6.6 GPa). A metal matrix was placed at the bottom of the box for each restoration, creating a cervical gap of about 100 µm wide. Samples were exposed to simulated caries lesion development in a lactic acid solution (pH 4.8) for 8 weeks in a Rub&Roll device. Half of the samples were subjected to 90 N cyclic loading. After demineralization, the teeth were sectioned. Wall lesion development was measured using microradiography (transversal wavelength-independent microradiography) in two different locations (location 1: 1,000 µm and location 2: 1,600 µm from the gap entrance) and recorded in lesion depth (LD) (µm) and mineral loss (µm × vol%). Linear regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of loading and material on wall lesion development. Mean wall LD in location 1 across all groups was 150.83 µm with a standard deviation (SD) of 61.83 µm. In location 2, mean overall wall LD was 102.98 µm with an SD of 64.92 µm. Linear regression showed no significant effect of either loading or material on wall lesion development. Occlusal loading had no significant effect on secondary caries lesion development in composite class II restoration in this in vitro study.

Aging Reduces the Anticaries Effect of Antibacterial Adhesive - An In Vitro Biofilm Study.

PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated whether aging different restorative materials influences secondary caries development using a short-term in vitro biofilm model, hypothesizing that the antibacterial adhesive employed may lose its effect over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty enamel-dentin blocks were divided into 6 groups with n = 10 per group. The groups were restored with three different restorative materials, of which each sample contained an artificial gap: composite with conventional adhesive (CCA; negative control), composite with an antibacterial adhesive (CAA), and amalgam (A; positive control). Half of the groups were prepared fresh and half of the groups were submitted to an aging protocol consisting of water storage, thermocycling, storage in human saliva, and storage in 0.9% saline solution. All specimens were subjected to an intermittent 1% sucrose biofilm model for 20 days to create artificial caries lesions. Lesion progression in the enamel and dentin next to the different materials was measured as lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML), using transverse wavelength independent microradiography (T-WIM). Regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of aging on LD and ML per restorative material, corrected for gap size. RESULTS: In the amalgam group, aging led to shallower lesions and less mineral loss. Fresh amalgam samples showed an average lesion depth of 156.65 ± 39.18 µm at wall dentin locations. Aged amalgam samples had an average lesion depth of 73.42 ± 73.50 µm. Fresh CAA samples showed lower average surface mineral loss values (9104 ± 2631 µm•vol%) than did fresh CCA samples (13166 ± 4769 µm•vol%). After aging, this effect was absent, and the average mineral loss in the CAA group was 13382 ± 5586 µm•vol%, while in the CCA group it was 15518 ± 9283 µm•vol%. CONCLUSION: Aging can influence secondary caries development either positively or negatively depending on the kind of restorative material. Antibacterial adhesives may lose their effectiveness over time.

Secondary Caries in situ Models: A Systematic Review.

In situ caries research serves as a bridge between clinical research and laboratory studies. In this kind of research, volunteers wear a removable intraoral splint or prosthesis containing research samples. Many different in situ models exist to investigate secondary caries. This systematic review compared currently existing secondary caries models and their lesion progression per day values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched for relevant literature. Bias risk was assessed and model parameters and caries-related outcomes were extracted by 2 independent researchers. Where possible, caries-related outcomes were normalized by estimating lesion progression per day by dividing lesion depth extracted from microradiographic or microhardness data by the number of days the study lasted. RESULTS: The literature search identified 335 articles. After eliminating duplicates and selection, 31 articles were included. The models differed greatly on factors such as sample location, presence of fluoride in the model, and analysis methods. Three main groups could be identified by sample placement; 68% of models placed samples palatally in the upper jaw, and the lower jaw model could be divided into the buccal (26%) and approximal (6%) areas. Average lesion progression in enamel next to composite was 4.3 ± 2.8 µm (range1.1-8.8 µm/day). DISCUSSION: Studies conducted with palatal models showed caries progression rates 2-5 times higher than the estimated clinical progression rates. Lesion progression per day could be a useful tool for future comparison of models and establishing a standardized model.